CFD Simulation of milk performance parameters effect on the physical indices of spray dryer

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Shahr Majlesi branch, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

One type of drying process is spray drying, which is used to dry solutions. In this method, the quality and expected properties of the dried powder depend on the design parameters, performance parameters, and solution properties. Therefore, the aim of this research is to investigate the effect of the performance parameters of the injected solution on the physical indicators of the drying chamber for drying milk. For this purpose, the effect of the size of the sprayed particles at three levels of 50, 100, and 150 μm and the flow rate of the solution entering the dryer at six levels of 10×10-3, 15×10-3, 20×10-3, 25×10-3, 30×10-3, and 35×10-3 kg/s on the distribution of pressure, velocity, temperature, and moisture of the particles inside the dryer chamber was simulated using computational fluid dynamics. This simulation was performed using ANSYS fluent 18 software in a two-phase manner using the Euler-Euler method. The simulation results showed that increasing the milk mass flow rate and increasing the particle diameter led to an increase in velocity, a decrease in the temperature inside the chamber, and a decrease in the temperature of the outlet particles. The highest increase in velocity and the highest decrease in temperature of particles were 66% and 5%, respectively. While the pressure inside the chamber decreased with increasing milk particle diameter and the pressure inside the chamber increased with increasing milk mass flow rate, with the highest increase in pressure being 65%. The results also showed that about 50% of the moisture of solution in the cylindrical part of the drying chamber was removed from the particles.

Graphical Abstract

CFD Simulation of milk performance parameters effect on the physical indices of spray dryer

Highlights

  • Milk powder spray dryer was simulated by two-phase method and Euler-Euler approach by Fluent software.
  • The effect of the size and the flow rate of the sprayed particles on the pressure, velocity, temperature and moisture of the particles were simulated.
  • The validation of the results showed that the simulation results have a good correlation with the experimental results.
  • To maintain the quality of drying, the inlet flow rate of the solution and the size of the particles can be reduced.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Bhattacharjee, S., Mohanty, P., Sahu, J.K., & Sahu, J.N. (2024). A critical review on drying of food materials: Recent progress and key challenges. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 158, 107863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2024.107863.
[2] Wang, J.F., Brown, C., & Cleland, D.J. (2018). Heat pump heat recovery options for food industry dryers. International Journal of Refrigeration, 86, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.11.028.
[3]  Abedi, E. & Ghafori, H. (2024). Simulation of fluidized bed dryer using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Journal of Research in Mechanics of Agricultural Machinery, 13(4), 13-22. doi: 10.22034/jrmam.2024.14697.696. [In persian]
[4] Benavides, A, Cubillos, A., & Gómez, A. (2021). Spray drying experiments and CFD simulation of guava juice formulation. Drying Technology, 39, 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2019.1708382.
[5] Paes, T., Maria, C., Franco, L., & Leonel, M. (2019). Gelatinized sweet potato starches obtained at different preheating temperatures in a spray dryer. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 149, 1339-1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.105.
[6] Patel, R.P., Patel, M.P., & Suthar, A.M. ( 2009). Spray drying technology: An overview. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2(10), 44-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2009/v2i10.3.
[7] Nandiyanto, A.B.D, & Okuyama, K. (2011). Progress in developing spray-drying methods for the production of controlled morphology particles: From the nanometer to sub micrometer size ranges. Advanced Powder Technology; 22(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2010.09.011
[8] Cal, K., & Sollohub, K. (2010). Spray drying technique. I: Hardware and process parameters. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 99(2), 575-586. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.21886
[9] Barbosa-Cánovas G. V., Ortega-Rivas, E., Juliano, P., & Yan, H. (2006). Food Powders: Physical Properties, Processing, and Functionality. Springer Science & Business Media.
[10] Anandharamakrishnan, C., & Ishwarya, S. P. (2015). Spray Drying Techniques for Food Ingredient Encapsulation. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[11] Gutierrez Suarez, J.A., Galeano Uruena, C.H., & Gomez Mejia, A. (2025). Parametric CFD Study of Spray Drying Chamber Geometry: Part I—Effects on Airflow Dynamics. Chem. Engineering, 9(5), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering9010005.
[12] Demissie P., Hayelom, M., Kassaye A., Hailesilassie A., Gebrehiwot M., & Vanierschot, M.  (2019). Design , development and CFD modeling of indirect solar food dryer. Energy Procedia, 158, 1128–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.278.[13] Islam, M., Islam, I., Tusar, M., & Hamza, A.N. (2019). Effect of cover design on moisture removal rate of a cabinet type Effect of cover design on moisture removal rate of cabinet type solar food drying application. Energy Procedia. 160, 769–776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.181.
[14] Filková, I., Huang, L.X., & Mujumdar, A.S. (2015). Industrial spray drying systems, in: Mujumdar, A.S. (Ed.). Handbook of industrial drying, (pp. 191-226). CRC Press, Boca Raton.
[15] Xiao, J., Yang, S., George, O.A., Putranto, A., Wu, W.D., & Chen, X.D. (2019). Numerical Simulation of Mono-Disperse Droplet Spray Dryer: Coupling Distinctively Different Sized Chambers. Chemical Engineering Science., 200, 12-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.01.030.
[16] Buchholz, M., Haus, J., Pietsch-Braune, S., Kleine J¨ager, F., Heinrich, S. (2022). CFD-aided population balance modeling of a spray drying process. Adv. Powder Technol. 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2022.103636.
[17] Hernandez, B., Martín, M., Gupta, P. (2021). Numerical study of airflow regimes and instabilities produced by the swirl generation chamber in counter-current spray dryers. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 176, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.09.024.
[18] Moradi Maryamnegari, S., Ashrafizadeh, A., Baake, E., Guglielmi, M. (2022). Effects of thermal boundary conditions on the performance of spray dryers. J. Food Eng. 338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111250.
[19] Hernandez, B., Pinto, M.A., Martín, M. (2022). Generation of a surrogate compartment model for counter-current spray dryer. Fluxes and momentum modeling. Comput. Chem. Eng. 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107664.
[20] Kuriakose, R, & Anandharamakrishnan, C. (2010). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) applications in spray drying of food products. Trends Food Sci Technol., 21, 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.04.009.
[21] Lo, S. (2005). Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Spray Drying,. Dairy Science and Technology, 85, 353-359. https://doi.org/10.1051/lait:2005024.
[22] Jamaleddine T.J., & Ray M.B. (2010). Application of computational fluid dynamics for simulation of drying processes: a review. Dry Technology, 28, 120–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07373930903517458.
[23] Anandharamakrishnan, C. (2007). Computational fluid dynamics in food processing, 1st edn. Springer, London.
[24] Roustapour, O.R., Hosseinalipour, M., Gazor, H.R., Salehi. A. (2024). Computational fluid dynamics simulation of air flow in a spray dryer containing wall air pressure nozzle. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 26(3), 134-147.
[25] Sefidan, l.M., Sellier, M., Hewett, J.N., Abdollahi, A., Willmott, G.R., Becker. S.M. (2022). Numerical model to study the statistics of whole milk spray drying. Powder Technology, 411(1-2), 117923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117923.
[26] Coimbra, J.C., Lopes, L.C., Cotrim, W.S., Prata. D.M. (2024). CFD modeling of spray drying of fresh whey: Influence of inlet air temperature on drying, fluid dynamics, and performance indicators. Digital Chemical Engineering, 12, 100178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dche.2024.100178.
[27] Keogh, K., Murray, C., Kelly, J., & O’Kennedy, B. (2004). Effect of the particle size of spray-dried milk powder on some properties of chocolate. Dairy Science & Technology, 84(4), 375-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/lait:2004013.
[28] Coimbra, J.C., Martins, M.A., Oliveira, P.S., Minim, L.A. (2021). The potential use of a gyroid structure to represent monolithic matrices for bioseparation purposes : fluid dynamics and mass transfer analysis via CFD. Sep. Purif. Technol. 254, 117594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117594.
[29] Luo, J., Chen, L., Min, T., Shan, F., Kang, Q., Tao, W. (2020). Macroscopic transport properties of Gyroid structures based on pore-scale studies : permeability, diffusivity and thermal conductivity. Int. J. Heat. Mass Transf. 146, 118837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118837.
[30] Rogers, S. (2011). Developing and utilizing a mini food powder producion facility to produce industrially relevant particles for functionality testing. Ph.D thesis, Monash University, Australia.
[31] George, O.A., Chen, X.D., Xiao, J., Woo, M., & Che, L. (2015). An effective rate approach to modeling single-stage spray drying. AIChE J., 61, 4140–4151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.14940.